BLUFF OYSTERS
ALLEGED LIDEL. <Bv Telegraph—Press Association). INVERCARGILL, Oct. 16. A strong denial that oysters, as they left the beds at Bluff, were responsible for the outbreak of typhoid fever in the north, was voiced by a local fish and oyster merchant. “In my opinion the suggestion is all bunkum” the dealer said. “The trouble might have been caused by oad water or drinks, or fruit, or bad sanitation. I probably eat as many oysters as anyone in the world. I eat two or -three dozen eVerv day on the average, and I’ve never felt the least ,md effects.” The same dealer said that if oysters bad actually been the cause of, the outbreak, it was not through infection received here, but through lack of care by dealers or housewives.” “There should be softie regulation to limit the sale of oysters to proper fish merehats. Why at present, even fruit shops stock them.” he said. “Then housewives often keep them for a week and expect them to remain good.” He strenuously denied that they could receive infection in Bluff. After being trawled from Foveaux strait they were kept on bed- ft 1 oyster wharf in Bluff “in good salt water.”
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19291017.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 17 October 1929, Page 1
Word count
Tapeke kupu
200BLUFF OYSTERS Hokitika Guardian, 17 October 1929, Page 1
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.