Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A BRIBERY CHARGE

HIGH COURT’S . DECISION. (Uoited Press Association —By Electric Telegraph—Copyright). j (Received this day at 11 aim.) :1;;..' /' SYDNEY, Oct. 16. . 'The ,High Court in a reserved judgment upheld an appeal bv the Crown aghirist the' decision of the Full Court in the case of Babcock Wilcox Ltd. and restored the penalties imposed on the, respondent firm last year. The Court held that the circumstances of' the case supported the finding that the late Sir Charles Ivemnal caused .£10,600 to be placed to the credit of Frank Buckle in payment of a bribe demanded by Silas Maling. vln July of. last year the firm was convicted, of /bribery Silas Maljng as a reward for'his recommending their tender for plant to be accepted, and were fined £IOOO and - ordered to refund £10,630 to! the Sydney City Council.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19291017.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 17 October 1929, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
138

A BRIBERY CHARGE Hokitika Guardian, 17 October 1929, Page 5

A BRIBERY CHARGE Hokitika Guardian, 17 October 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert