Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FOOTBALL

RUGBY LEAGUE. AUSTRALIANS BEAT YORK* " ; (United Press Association—By Electri® Telegraph—Copyright). LONDON, Sept. 11. The Australian League team beat York bv’ 32—11. ' 1 ■ : ; '*• , . .*■ -—. i i —. jMaMBI , r r ' w SCRUM FORMATION. t BRITISH OR DOMINION? LONDON, August lj? Mr C. W. PackfoycUpens the* following in the “Sporting Tiife”.:— ? It is- my gratifying to read in a cable from Sydney,* that “the improvement in. the jflandArd. of the Australian Rugby Union game, following the visit to England of the Waratahs in 1927, has been demonstrated •by the Australian successes against the touring New Zealand team.”, . ...hIt hears out what 1 have long contended, that, apart from individual skill, the formation /adopted ;by the four British Unions is superior'Jto that of the Dominions. ?'.V

Neither Australia nor New Zealghd has yet officially recognised t.that with, the magnificent physical resources;,.attheir command their gamesJ would'be more effective if their forwards packed 3-2-3, instead of a combination* of seven men, who must necessarily '.be handicapped in an attempt to obtain possession. The ideal distribution .of weight alone in the British games makes this inevitable. .WiL

I am quite prepared, now that'they have lost three of their four. .- Tests with Australia—a fate thatnever bn opened to them before—to find New Zealand, listening in all seriousness to the suggestions of Mark Nicliolls, possibly the , greatest player in the invincible 1924cteam, that‘ ! so far as the forwards are concerned there should be 'an alteration of methods by the inclusion of another man.

' Nieliolls, bauas his argument ron the fact that during the 1924 tour their backs were not put in possession as frequently 'as would have been the case had the 3-2-3 formation • beeii in operation. And Bis opinions are regarded ..in.. lNewiZealaut]; as:i;>p; • uable that I am quite prepared to see them adopted when the British 'team visits the Antipodes hi. 1930.' • Frankly, the whole thing to me is very amusing. I shall never forget in 1924 when. the All Blacks were sweeping everything before them, how the Rugby Union, qr rather the Selection Committee, were solemnly nrned that; they would he courting ’disaster- if- they did hot- field ‘an ,i,pterpationnl team with a formation exactly similar to that of our rivals. They were, fortunately, not at . all intimidated; v -afid gave as a ‘fifteen . that was distinctly unlucky . not ?.f°. have won a memorable game—in fact, nothing will ever 'convince me « two of the New Zealand tries on that occasion—especially one •’ By Steelshould not have Been ' disallowed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19290912.2.51

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 12 September 1929, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
411

FOOTBALL Hokitika Guardian, 12 September 1929, Page 5

FOOTBALL Hokitika Guardian, 12 September 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert