Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DAIRY CONTROVERSY

MR IORNvS’ REPLY (By Telegraph—Press Association)* WELLINGTON, gepfc. .2. In the course of a statement in connection with the Dairy controversy, Air loins, Chairman of the Dairy Board, ( remarks- that the; .Secretary of the South Island Association appears to object to the Boai;dsripproving of the butter contract without consulting individual • factories:This is exactly what , the South ( Island, Association did some years ago- They agreed with the , exporters regarding Jtlie , standard of 1 . control: without consulting individual factories, and in fate-of ,objections from . representatives of 'the National Association -ijiAfhe North : The statement that the adaption of the finest grade,,as a basic grade'in butter >;• contracts, represents .v loss to the producer, 1 is of course farciai. Those who object to the basis'll at finest grade seem to imagine i .|that. i if buyers' were jotfering Is Bd^f.Oib/'ffbi-finest butter, and ,1s ..52d for ,first T gradp, then if the 'contract provided for first-grade as a basis, bnyers .would qffer Is. 6d for first “ grade-and Is 6}d for finest.' I The Secretary of,the; South Island Dairy Association and friends might imagine exporters are rouges, but we cannot think they Hold' the opinion . that they are false. - A ''*<■ Air lorns also says; that Mr Wright is making a mistake'when he says-Hie ,•). Board has approved of clauses ijl Hie ■ < cheese contract which provides foi 4 ‘ ; a premium for- finest grade, The Board t ; has not discussed nor has it agreed to ™ any of the clauses of the suggested *3 standard cheese ( contract. tf £7

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19290902.2.53

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 2 September 1929, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
250

DAIRY CONTROVERSY Hokitika Guardian, 2 September 1929, Page 5

DAIRY CONTROVERSY Hokitika Guardian, 2 September 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert