Burrows and Cottrell were equal to Irvine and lteid in hooking the ball. In the second spell Wairarapa won the game by sterling forward play, which' was maintained from start,, to finish. Tire back play was very, even, but Wairarapa, of bourse, had t&e advantage when their forwards gained control. , The Canterbury plaqe kicking was very porn*, only two points being added in this manner where a good kicker could (penalty included) have put on seven. Tiyo of the Wairarapa tries were converted. The scores were made up es follow Wairarapa—Three, tries (two converted!, one field goal. ' Canterbury—Two tries (one converted) , one field goal. . ..» The game was played in a < good spirit and was very ably' refereed. V.'
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19290830.2.27
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 30 August 1929, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
118Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 30 August 1929, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in