Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A VIVID CONTRAST

, ! THE LAND POLICIES, j liMJ- | THE FORWARD MOVE.^jj : - WELLINGTON, July 17 ’ ’ Thirty years ago, according to Hr J. A.|i Macpherson (Oamaru), iNow 'Zealand was in ■a'lsimilar position in regard to land settlement as to-day. There'was a dearth of land, he told the House, last night, but the Libera.!

•Government of that day took the ma ster tip; and; • througji the splendid el', forts-of- Mr Seddon, Sir Joseph AV*i"U and the late Sir John M’Kenzie. they accomplished such wonders that New Zealand was-placed~ oti 'the 'map lor all time. To-day, there was just the same necessity for a„ closer seC. tleinent policy. He was interested to find in the 1928 Land Statement that the Reform Government claimed .tLui during the year over 40,(XX) acres h.id been selected. The report did not sav * ‘settled’?' .-.rand 'vfor • good - reason, because’ the figures included gravel pits leased jtotcOuiity councils, as was doriv year after year, and the bulk of tie remainder was the renewal of gradng run leases to old tenants. Special men tion was made of three sections taken up- at- Clifden, Otago, but the report did--not'mention that these had been on the- market for years and v/-?re written down to a low price. Gnat, areas of small grazing runs were renewed to the old lessees for thirty years at the present or lower rentals, though he knew many valuable runs which, if put up for public compc" - tion, would have fetched five times the rental. One ho had in mind was a fine property, carrying 14,000 sheep leased to the old tenant for £240 per annum before anybody knew about lit- .<v\ A Mr Coates: What case was. that 2 replied, that he wo if Id be pleased to give every deincluding the number of the 'block, privately, hut he did not w>sh to irag in the name of the ten:irv\ for '*■the whole blame rested, not op individuals, but on the legislation o! Government and edmirmtrati'dn, which allowed them to take advantage of it. Miy,Coates: The Land Board agree.:. Mr Macpherson repeated that it w.ithe law, and when people realised what, had been done under that legislation in Otago and Canterbmy, and the North Island, they would get a surprise.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19290720.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 20 July 1929, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
372

A VIVID CONTRAST Hokitika Guardian, 20 July 1929, Page 3

A VIVID CONTRAST Hokitika Guardian, 20 July 1929, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert