Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT A SHOP

APPEAL DISMISSED. y By ieJeg.aph—l'er Press Association.) DUNEDIN, June 13. ' Claiming that an automatic machine for tlie sale of photographic films was a ; . shop within the meaning df the Act, the Inspector of Factories recently appealed to the Supreme Court .against the Magistrate’s decision^*that it was not a shop. Justice Smith’s judgment was given , this morning. The automatic machine in question was erected against a telegraph pole. The Judge held that a shop must lie a place capable of physical occupancy by the occupier and he dismissed tlie appeal. ;;

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19290613.2.59

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 13 June 1929, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
92

NOT A SHOP Hokitika Guardian, 13 June 1929, Page 5

NOT A SHOP Hokitika Guardian, 13 June 1929, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert