Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROFICIENCY

THE SPELLING TEST.

DUNEDIN, April 17. A discussion took place at the mectng of the Otago Education Board to-

clay regarding the spelling test for tiior proficiency examination. The subject arose as a result of a complaint made by Mr Dyke, the parent of a girl who had failed in the test. My Dyke recently wrote to the Board and the Board, in forwarding his letter to the Minister, appended the following comment by the chairman: I beg to differ. Tt seems to me a ridiculous idea that the value of the correct spelling of a word us something like four-fifths of one, while three marks are deducted if it is. spelt wrong.

Senior Inspector Stuckey: There were pupils last year who obtained proficiency with absolutely no marks for spelling. Mr J. Mitchell said he was aware of that, hut the fact remained that they still allowed 25 points for spelling, and they required over 60 per cent, correct to get any marks at all. Senior-Inspector Stuckey said that •was not correct. The discussion was on wrong lines. The marks for spelling were 20. The chairman: The test is on 25 words.

Senior-Inspector Stuckey explained that the marks for spelling were 20, and the other five were for composition.

The chairman : The fact remains that four-fifths of one is the marking for the correct spelling of a word, and that three marks are deducted if it is spelt wrong.

Senior-Inspector Stuckey: Two and a-half.

He read the spelling tost to the Board, and members agreed that while the words were such as a. Standard VI. pupil might reasonably lie expected to have met with during his school career, vet they were nearly all of a “catchy* nature and a veritable pitfall to a pooi speller. At to-day’s meeting of the Board tlie Minister’s reply was received. It stated: “The tests in spelling have been carefully perused, and it is not considered that a disproportionate number of the words would prevent difficulty to the average Standard VT. pupil. Further experience has shown that to mark the spelling tost more leniently .than at present would permit of an unduly high percentage of marks in this subject. The aim of the test in the subjects for a proficiency certificate is to obtain a pass standard which represents a standard of good attainment in the subjects of Standard YT.” The Minister added that it was unfortunate that Mr Dyke’s daughter appeared to have found difficulty in the test for spelling, but he did not think that the method of examination iii this subject was at fault. On the motion of the Hon Mr Fleming it was unanimously, resolved to express disagreement with the contention of the Department down to the word “subject.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19290419.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 19 April 1929, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
459

PROFICIENCY Hokitika Guardian, 19 April 1929, Page 3

PROFICIENCY Hokitika Guardian, 19 April 1929, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert