Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IN THE LORDS

DEBATE ON DISARMAMENT

United Press Association —By Electric Telegraph—Copyright).

(Received this day at 12.25. p.m.) RUGBY. November 15.

There was a short debate in tin* House of Lords to-day on the subject of disarmament. It was begun hv Lord Parmoor. who was British representative to the League of Nations while the Labour Government were in office in 1924.

Lord Parmoor moved that- the House regretted that the British delegation to the recent meetings of the League Assembly did not give effective support to a further policy o'f disarmament and all-inclusive arbitration. Lord Cushoiulcn. who* is acting as Foreign Secretary, and is tin; present representative to the League of Nations. replied. He referre ! Lord Parmoor to the statements which he had already made oil this subject. He repudiated Lord Parmoor’s contention that if the protocol proposed by the Labour Government had been accepted, evervthing else would have iolloweo successfully. On the contrary, he believed if the protocol had iinfortimatoly been carried. so if ji r from helping disarmament, we should have had to increase our naval and military forces in order fo bo in a position to make good oin p liabilities under that instrument. This eountrv had given every possible demonstration of its desire to go to any possible length in Urn attempt to reach agreement on disarmament. He entirely repudiated any idea that the backward position in regard to disarmament which he regretted as much as Lord Parmoor. was due in any way to act and omissions ol the present. Government. The onlv point of disagreement between himself and Lord Parmoor was a s to the most- effective and feasible method for a peaceful settlement ol disputes. The Government proilerml the method of bilateral treaties or regional treaties, to those which were lelt open for signature by any State that came along, lie submitted that Lord Parmoor had utterly tailed to substantiate the charge in his motion. The motion was defeated by 33 votes to 10.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19281116.2.35

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 16 November 1928, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
330

IN THE LORDS Hokitika Guardian, 16 November 1928, Page 5

IN THE LORDS Hokitika Guardian, 16 November 1928, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert