MOTOR INSURANCE BILL.
DUNEDIN MAN’S CRITICISM
loN|t|pi;&eptember 28., / “It is my 6siniqn that this is ‘rush’, legislation not beeri ’ given due and proper consideration,” said a prominent insurance man and also a keen motorist when asked 'for his views on the Motor insurance Bill, “and.it is a distinct violation of the liberty of the subject^”-\ </ ' * . He declare^'':that it was quite incorcorect to say That'2s per cent.. of motorists on thtflrOnd were not insured, stating that not more than 10 per cent of the motoring public were uninsured, and those that were uninsured were people with unihsiirahle cars, people who were unirgsurable themselves for obvious reasons, and certain wealthy people who carried their ,own risk. “Personally, I believe the Government would be wise to drop the Bill for this session and. have evidence taken from motorists and insurance officers,” the insurance man stated. “I think that such evidence would clearly go to prove the fallacy of the proposition.” ’ H.o
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19281004.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 4 October 1928, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
158MOTOR INSURANCE BILL. Hokitika Guardian, 4 October 1928, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in