Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WAR ON CANCER

A FAMOUS SURGEON’S SURVEY. Rrobahly the most important conference ever held on cancer lias just con-, eluded its discussions in London. Or--1 ganised by the British Empire Cancer Campaign, it has been a great success. Tho leading experts of IS nations have said their say. All the latest theories and discoveries have been debated and examined with great tliorr. oughness and innumerable papers have * been written. But the lay public are naturally asking, What is the significance of it all? Are we any nearer a cure for the disease?' 4 - Has the conference given a now message cf hope for humanity? The situation was summed up by Sir Thomas Horder, Bart., Physician-iu-Ordinary to the Prince of Wales and Physician to the Cancer Hospital, London, who took a prominent part in : the discussions. In an interview wijtli a “Daily Mail” ■ reporter,' Sir Thomas Horder, said: So far as- conferences ever accomplish anything, I think this one lias been as successful as any I have known. In reply to the question, “Is there a stronger hope of finding a cure for cancer as’a result of this conference? ; I should like to say that I believe that a‘ definite advance has been made in this direction. Moreover the air has been cleared; we realise more cleaily what we do not know. Perhaps the most important lesson emerging from the discussions is that /v thd most successful treatment is still - in .the sphere , of surgery and radiology and that at .this-stage of our knowpledge we cannot throw over known

methods of deviling with the disease for those the value of which are still to he demoustri-ited. As I am no veil - tired of emphasising, the patient is the crux of the matter. Investigations am 1 research must needs , go on. and the many fallacies connected with them mm it he gradually eliminated, but the seriousness of the patient’s condition is such that something has got to be done, and that without delay. Surgery and radliology have still got the first claims in treatment, in spite of anything that has been said at this conference has emphasised the possibility of the use of adjuncts to those measures, such as t h< * use of chemical substances,, sera, etc. . There are three masin points around when this conference inis centred: v- (1) THE CAUSE «F CANCER. We are still very much in tho dark. The parasitic theory—Hurt cancer is a microhm process —is still the lavonnto hypothesis, and may yet, despite the epoch-making work of Dr .James Murphy (New York) and. his collaborators, prove to he correct. Dr Murphy s , contribution to this part of the sub- ; ject has been the most {sensational of all the papers handed ?n during the conference. He has adduced reasons for regarding the actual cause of some cancers at least as being •somewhat oi the nature of a chemical ferment. These researches have been clone on chiekens. In a susceptible strain of these birds the injection of this “agent” can he made to reproduce the chicken-tumour with great constancy. Dr. Murphy’s now -discoveries lie in the direction of showing that this “agent” has properties that seem to remove it from tho category of microbes, and it was thc-lse discov- ;

cries that caused so much interest at the conference. This work will, of course, ho .subjected to critical examination by other researchers. If it is confirmed, and if I lie facts now brought forward are shown to ho applicable to human cancer, there is scarcely any limit to the possibilities by way of further progress that the discovery opens up. Dr. Murphy’s researches extend over a period of nearly twenty years; like nearly all medical researches they were seriously interrupted, and the results consequently much postponed, hv the war. (2) THE IMPORTANCE OF EARLY DIAGNOSIS. This is the second point of importance brought out at the conference. If we wait until the cancer patient is ill we have waited too long. Discovery of the presence of the disease should he made at the earliest possible moment, and the only way of doing this is by careful attention to early symptoms." Inasmuch as certain symptoms have a special significance to the experienced doctor it behoves anyone in doubt about his health to seek competent advice.

Internal cancer is a much more serious problem than external cancer — the stomach and the bowel present a more difficult and a more subtle problem than growths on the surface of the body. It is essential that we doctors should familiarise ourselves still more with special instruments which supplement our ordinary clinical examination of the patient. X-rays examination has been of enormous service in early diagnosis, and no doubt the radiologist’s technique will continue to improve in the near future.

(3) TREATMENT. 1 already have said that surgery and radiology must at present have the first claim. There is a growing tendency to submit some cases of cancer to radiation treatment which formerly were treated surgically. But consideration of this question requires groat experience. There is, however, an increasing body of opinion in favour of some cancers of the womb being treated entirely by radium or X-rays rather than by surgery, and many surgeons themselves take this view. The combination of both methods is tho ideal choice in a large number of cases. With regard to treatment by cheffiotherapliy—the use of certain heavy metals, for example—the remedy for which has been exploited of late has been lead. One of the most animated of the sessions was that at which this subject was introduced by Professor Blair Bell, who has given great thought and spent much time over it. The preparation of lead now in use is probably not the last word in the choice of the drug. It is a question of improving the remedy, and we may have with lead an experience similar to that with “ 606,” tlie remedy for syphilis. The first preparations of this drug used were highly toxic, and some of the patients undoubtedly died a.s the result of its injection, but it has now been so much improved that it is in evei’yday use and can be safely administered by any careful doctor. If lead, or some other substance, were improved to this extent and made capable of bringing about resorption of cancer cells, it would be very valuable, partly because some cases of cancer are inoperable and because there is too often a- fear of recurrence of the dis-

ease even after surgery or radiation has been successfully used. A WORD TO THE PUBLIC. What advice can we give to the public in relation to the disease? I would suggest the following:— (1) Obey the laws of cause and effect as applied to health, and thus keep fit. (2) So long as you are fit, don’t worry about your health, and don’ t entertain fears of cancer. (3) Avoid the quack and popular hooks on cancer as you would the plague. (4) Periodically consult your doctor. (Do not imagine it an easier job for him to find out if you are healthy than iu is to prove you are diseased.) (5) If you notice any departure from your usual health which you do not understand ask your doctor to tell you what it means. It may be quit--trivial, if may be vital, in its significance. (6) A man or woman who is unfortunate enough to contract the disease should trust to tlie judgment of his or her doctor as to which is the best available treatment for his or her particular case. Each has to he taken on its individual merits.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19281003.2.56

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 3 October 1928, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,272

WAR ON CANCER Hokitika Guardian, 3 October 1928, Page 7

WAR ON CANCER Hokitika Guardian, 3 October 1928, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert