Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

The semi-official! statement regarding the naval treaty alleged between Britain and France should clear the air considerably in diplomatic circles. Lord, Gushendun had explained rather clearly 'before that the proposals were tentative and but a preliminary step towards ultimate settlement if the other Powers were agreeable to the procedure This was perfectly plain and frank, but it suited other nations to te critical, and the United States through its President even cast a good deal of doubt on the bonafides of the position as explained. In the United States also the occasion was used to discount the prospects of the Kellogg Pact being ratified by the Senate, a result which would be greatly deplored. When the naval disarmament was last considered :bv the Powers, the Conference broke down because of failure to agree to. quotas. Before the next sitting, it appeared a wise course for those in disagreement to get together and endeavour by preliminary steps to arrange a quota which would be acceptable when the parties met. Certainly any suggestions at this early stage would give the parties concerned time to examine them more dispassionately in their home offices, than at •< conference table later on. The course wias similar to issuing remits in advance so that the Powers could come prepared with their views on the basis proposed, and submit their criticisms or amendments in conclusive shape. It was quite a commendable procedure, and to our view Was a frank way 0,.f explaining the Franco-British viewpoint on a question in which the two nations are bo closely concerned. It seemed to us unfortunate at the time that the American President took the public steps he did to hint at reprisals as a means to counteract what his • advlusers- seenrukl toi think wtas irregular. At the same time we must remember a bitter party election is in progress in the States and perhaps Mr Coolidge thought it advisable to beat the big drum to attract attention to something outside local politics which might not be so favourable to the party ticket. Be that as it may the official statement of the naval treaty proposed should clear the air and manifest tlie honest intentions of Britain, and France in the matter.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280925.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 25 September 1928, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
370

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 25 September 1928, Page 4

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 25 September 1928, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert