Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

By Telegraph—Press Assn., Copyright. AUCKLAND, Sept. 17. Judge Heed heard an appeal by John William Hope against six months’ sentence by Sir Hunt, S.M., for failing to comply with a summons or maintenance order made in England. Hope disputed that he was the man named in the summons. He had been before three different magistrates, all of whom were satisfied be was the man. After hearing new evidence, Judge Heed dismissed the appeal, saying be was satisfied Hope was the man. Huia Keith Allan and William Joseph Whyte, two labourers, were each sentenced to six months’ imprisonment on eighteen charges ol thefts from vessels. Judge Heed said it was a very serious offence. It was difficult to catch perpetrators and when caught they should be severely punished as a ■deterrent to others.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280918.2.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 18 September 1928, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
134

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 18 September 1928, Page 1

SUPREME COURT Hokitika Guardian, 18 September 1928, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert