Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SLATER’S CONVICTION SET ASIDE.

Australian Press Assn.—United Service

LONDON, July 20. Slater’s conviction was unanimously set aside.

THE JUDGE’S FINDING

(Received this day at 9.30 a.m.)

LONDON, Julv 20.

In the Sinter case, the Lord Justice General said the court was unable to hold the jury’s verdict as reasonable. He did not think the new evidence of Doctor Adam and Police Marshall and Pinkle.v had any material bearing. It could not be assumed, without evidence, that responsible officers of the Crown had concealed anything material from the defence. The question of the abandoned character of appellants mode of life, however, raised a difficult problem. The cross-exminntion of witnesses for the defence had shown that the appellant was living in a place where he pretended to practice dentistry, with two women, one of whom was a prostitute. The Prosecutor speaking to the jury, explained the brutality of the assault upon Gilchrist, by pointing out tlie depravity of tlie appellant-, who was living partly upon the proceeds of prostitution.

As a vital point, the proof ol identity in this case, presented an unusual difficulty. Tlie jury might easily be influenced in any direction or another, hence the Court was of the opinion the clearest and most unambiguous instructions by the presiding judge were imperatively demanded to prevent tlie jury misunderstanding the opening passages of the speech for the prosecution. The Judge’s charge did not remove the erroneous impression, on tho contrary it was calculated to confirm it. The jury were told that the presumption of innocence had less effect oil the case of appellant in the light of his ambiguous character than if his character were not open to suspicion. Tho presumption of innocence applied to everyone charged with crime. It was fundamental of tho whole system of criminal prosecution. 1 The Court therefore considered the Judge’s charges amounted to a misdirection in law, and the conviction should he set aside.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280721.2.35

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 21 July 1928, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
319

SLATER’S CONVICTION SET ASIDE. Hokitika Guardian, 21 July 1928, Page 3

SLATER’S CONVICTION SET ASIDE. Hokitika Guardian, 21 July 1928, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert