Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ABORTION CHARGE

AGAINST A DOCTOR

By Telegraph—Press Assn., Copyright.

WELLINGTON, Alay 9

The trial of Joseph Patrick Hennessy, medical practitioner, of having unlawfully used an instrument on a woman with intent to procure a miscarriage, opened in the Supreme Court to-day, Air Justice Reed being on the Bench.

Before proceeding with the hearing the Judge directed that the names of the two principal witnesses, either in the evidence or in the N indictment, should hot be published, nor any reference made to their respective occupations or place of residence, nor of any matter that might point to their identity.

An order was -also made clearing the Court. , Evidence is proceeding on the lines of that given in the Lower Court. In answer to AH' Finger, the girl concerned ,in the case said she "as considerably upset when taken to the. police station and asked to make « statement. She did, not remember any actual threat, hut Detective AlcLennan said the best thing for her was to make the statement. She made the statement because she did not know how much they knew. Detective McLennan said: “We know all about you; it’s no rise you trying to bluff us.” AlcLerinrm also said that if she gave truthful, evidence at the trial, tho police would suggest she lie pardoned Tor any part she had taken. She was to be given an indemnity. The principal male witness said that tho two detectives called at his house at 2.30 in the morning. They had a typewriter and two electric torches. It was a surprise, and not a very pleasant one. One torch illuminated the paper,' the other the typewriter. 1- >• was suggested that if he did not make a statement lie would be put in U>e dock. He bad since received an indemnity against prosecution.

Arcus El) ACQTJITTEB. WELLINGTON, Afay 10

Joseph Patrick : 1-lennessy, Wellington, medical prneti tinner, formerly o* Auckland, was acquitted, after halt an hour’s retirement of the jury in th e case in which he was charged with unlawfully using an instrument on a woman to bring about a miscarriage. '

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280510.2.29

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 10 May 1928, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
348

ABORTION CHARGE Hokitika Guardian, 10 May 1928, Page 3

ABORTION CHARGE Hokitika Guardian, 10 May 1928, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert