MAGISTRATE'S COURT

Hokitika Guardian, 15 March 1928, Page 2

MAGISTRATE'S COURT

THURSDAY. MARCH 15th. (Refore NY. Meldrum, Esq., S.M.) LICENSING ACT. On charges of Ibeing found on licen- ; sed premises after hours convictions i and fines were recorded as follows: One resident (Commercial Hotel) to ■ pay costs 10s. Another offender (Masonic Hotel) to pay costs- Pis. One offender (Lake TCanieri Hotel) to pay costs 10s. Throe offenders (Southlard Hotel) each to pay costs 10s. One offender (Post Office Hoi!" I) to pay costs 70s. On a charge of procuring Ifuor while prohibited, a first offender Pus fined 5s and costs 10s. borough rye-laws. Will. Ga.vlor, Borough Inspector. (Air Park) charged Arch. Millar with riding a bicycle at night without a light. Fined 5s and costs 10s. counsel’s fee 10s Gd Same v. L. Tsrnilson, similar charge. Fined 5s and costs 10s, counsel’s fee 10s Gd. Same v. E. Tooliey, similar charge. Fined 5s and costs 10s, counsel’s fee 10s Gd. Same v. las. Roxborough. a charge of cycling on footpath. I'ined os and costs 10s, counsel's fee 10s Gd. Same v. Geo. Mclntosh, cycling on a footpath. Fined os and costs 725. counsel’s fee 10s Gd. Same v. Charles Outliroy. a charge of allowing a cow to wander. Fined 5s and costs 10s. counsel’s foe 10s (id. PAID INTO COURT. In two maintenance cases for arrears. the amount was paid into Court. On the application of Air Murdocli counsel’s fee was allowed £1 Is each. DEBT CASES. Wallenstein Bros (Air Elcock) v. N. Hill. Claim CG Ids Id. Judgment for balance unpaid CG IGs -Id and costs 31s Gd. Bei.ton and Co. Air Elcock) v. John Box d .claim £2 P2s Gd. Judgment for plaintiff with costs 23s Gd. AY. R. Stopfortli (Mr Sellers) v. (To. Freitas, claim £J Vos. Judgment for plaintiff with costs 19s Gd. Renton and Co. (.Mr Elcock) v. NYm. Henderson, claim £G ss. Judgment for plaintiff with costs 30s Gd. Same v. Allan Dale, claim 15s. Judgment Tor plaintiff with costs Ss. Same %•. Thos Benyon. claim £lO 10s. Judgment for plaintiff with costs C2 11s. Roy Paterson v. Laurie George, claim Cl 2s. Judgment for plaintiff wit i costs 10s. S. J. Preston (Air Park) v. Robert Eraser, claim £3 IGs Pd. Judgment for plaintiff with costs 23s Gd. NYm. Berry and Son. (Air Elcock) v Ed Gronfsky. Judgment summons £9 Gs.' Order made for payment of £1 per month. On the application of Air Park substitution of service was granted Hokitika Borough Council against C. Gibbons.