Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

DF.sriTK the good intentions of those advocating tlie maintenance of prohibition in the United States, incidents are cropping up continually which go to .show that the whole movement is men acini on all sides by very serious evils—quite apart from the cost of endeavouring so ineffectually to enforce national prohibition—which is not being done The subject has invaded the Presidential contest, and is going to lie quite a factor in that disturbing upheaval Senator Borah lias often been described as the “stormy petrel of American politics.” and he never laid claim to the title more effectively, says an exchange, than when he decided to intake the liquor question a test for Presidential candidates. I lie difficulty of making up one’s mind alKi.it the relative merits of the various claimants is almost insuperable, and flic problem may seem to lie simplified by asking everv one of their, in succession whether lie is “wet” or “dry.” Rut what may be gained in that way is certainly lost in others, not simply' through the confusion of public issues, hut through the hitler and vindictive spirit that the liquor question always introduces Into public life One particularly painful feature of this “nation wide” struggle was brought out the other day in the House of Representatives by ohc. Dr Sii'ovieh. He is a Democrat and member fob New York ('itv and being also a doctor, lie spoke with some authority when lie denounced the “use of poison as a denaturant’’ in industria’ alcohol. “through drinking liquor which is loaded with poison prescribed by |lie Government.” It is a shocking iml id nielli. and ii shows how completely the ordinary standards ol social Mill public conduct have been degraded or ignored by those participating in this distracting quarrel. It is not so very long ago. I hat a cable message from Washington stated that Treasury statistics showed the enforceinent of prohibition had cost nearly 300 lives Some 54 agents were killed oil duty and six eoastgtiardsmen were slain and 100 other members of the “dry navy’ wen' lost. In the name uf selfilofenco 125 liquor runners were killed by Government agents. There is no record of the number injured, hut the total is believed to run into several thousand. And all the time, unfortunately, prohibition docs no! prohibit, Money can purchase good and bad liquor at all times and in all places according to the experience of visitors (o Llie States.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280313.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 13 March 1928, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
405

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 13 March 1928, Page 2

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 13 March 1928, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert