Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE U.S.A. NAVY

Australian & N.Z. Cable Association.)

WASHINGTON, Feb. G. The hearings are practically completed before the House Naval Committee. , The uncertainty concerning the exact (ost of the programmes is visualised in a statement by Representative \ onson, who said he recokned the naval appropriation for the next eight years would tofd 1152 million dollars, and Representative Britton said the total would lie three billions. Secretary of the Navy Robinson therefore has been asked to ptep.m a chart showing complete details, and t 10 cost of all vessels proposed. Commander Burney informally toll the Committee that English statesmen did not consider the American Pj° gramme in the light of competitive building.

LiTVINOFF’S PROPOSAL

PREFERABLE TO KELLOGG’S. LONDON. Eeh. (5.. The " Morning Rost s ” Baris io.itspmident says that many columns of newsprint are devoted to the commemoration of the 15()th anniversary ot the Eranco-American treaty and relations and the signature of the new Arbitration Treaty. M. Briaml entertained the American Ambassador at a. large banquet in the evening. As though not desiring to spoil the occasion, the press almost entirely ignores Mr Kellogg’s submarine suggestion. and no official proposal on the subject has yet been received. I* ranee will undoubtedly reply. She is willing to destroy submarine' it I idled States destroys dreadnoughts. Mi' Kellogg’s proposition following on the heels ot the new capital ship programme, appears to France to he merely a poor election dodge. Even Liivinofl’s sweeping disarmament proposition at Genet a is regarded as preferable to Mr Kellogg's. Litvinolf at any rate suggested, u all-round reduction and not a scheme hitting some navies severely and not touching others.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280208.2.21

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 8 February 1928, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
269

THE U.S.A. NAVY Hokitika Guardian, 8 February 1928, Page 2

THE U.S.A. NAVY Hokitika Guardian, 8 February 1928, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert