Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AMERICAN NEWS

AMERICA’S NAVY. :MR. WILBUR’S STATEMENT. WASHINGTON; Jan. 11. Mr Wilbur, before the House Naval -Affairs Committee, revealed that the ■ eight hundred million dollars’ building programme he recommended to Congress was drafted as a five-year programme for the immediate needs of the Navy, it was regarded as a start. He recommended an additional twentyyear programme of building replacement, which should provide forty-three 10,000-ton cruisers and additional submarines and destroyers. Mr Wilbur emphasised a five-year programme meant no competitive building. It was not proposed to meet the building programme of other nations. The Secretary explained, however, that this brought the United States navy well within the equality rates fixed by the Washington Conference, as compared with Great Britain and “ slightly above the 5—3 ratio with Japan.” Mr Wilbur cited the insistence of ■Great Britain at Geneva for her need of increased tonnage regardless of that of other powers, and the persuasive evidence of the United States’ need for increased cruiser tonnage, also that such a programme for the United States was in no sense competitive, to which President Coolidge is said to be opposed He said the programme was siinpli ' based on the .needs of the “United States navy, determined by the naval technical board. Mr Wilbur said it woulc cost the United States a billion dollars to build cruisers to the limit set bj Britain. He said that surplus ships built under a twenty-year prog minim represented a conservative estimate o the actual protective needs. To built

-t enough immediately would be too great a burden on the nation’s peace time activities, but if a twenty-year programme were carried out, with a reaf sonable burden placed on Government, the danger of war would be greatly f minimised. United States needed a first-class navy. The naval building programme was based on the navy s needs in the same sense ns the city’s police force was based upon the estimate of its needs for the protection of tlie public. The report accompanying Mr A\ ilbuHs statement to the Committee, said: “‘Smart looking, modern cruisers create a prestige that aids merchants anil manufacturers in building up trade abroad and the measure of commercial success is influenced in no small degree ' by the prestige which up-to-date smartlooking cruisers create anil foster.”

VISITOR TO AMERICA. NEW YORK, Jan. 11. Julius arrived by the Majestic, which was delayed eight hours by bait weather. He said an American stay consumed too much time to include a visit to all parts of the United States and Canada. He would visit Washington next week to consult various Government bureaus and agencies.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19280112.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 12 January 1928, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
433

AMERICAN NEWS Hokitika Guardian, 12 January 1928, Page 3

AMERICAN NEWS Hokitika Guardian, 12 January 1928, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert