Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CORRESPONDENCE.

SOUTH WESTLAND DIFFERENCES

(To the Editor.)

Sir, —While speaking to his motion at the last Council meeting, re roading matters in this district, latterly under discussion in your paper, Or Donovan quoted some very doubtful facts. It seems that practically all his fellow councillors believed the information supplied to them by Cr Donovan regarding tlie new route as it is evident by their supporting remarks they have no personal knowledge of the locality. In comparing the Wataroa Gorge Road crossing with the ford at Dry Creek, Cr Donovan stated that ninety per cent of the cattle from south crossed the Wataroa River at the Dry Creek ford. This is altogether wrong, as ninety per cent of the cattle never leave the Main South road and cross by the Wataroa Bridge. As to his remarks about our having four roads to our mill we only know of one. And furthermore we bore the cost of forming, etc., of one and a-half miles of this road with the County Council on a £ for £ basis so as to enable us to have motor transport to our mill. In any case ours is an industry in the district and is deserving of consideration as regards roads transport should we be able to secure any.

The paradoxial attitude of the Wataroa and Harihari settlers towards the proposed new route did seem rathei bewildering. But when it is understood that when the support of the Harihari settlers was solicited they were led to believe that the Wataroa people were desirous of having the route opened. Imagine their chagrin when it was made to appear that the suggestion for the opening of the route came from them. Your paper has pointed out that the County Council met the wishes of the Farmers’ Union here by not tampering with the Waitangi grants. This was right to a degree but they also made a special point of the proposal for duplicating our roading system here, it being unwarranted. It is to be hoped that the protests voiced by the Farmers’ Union here will not go unnoted by the Government officials and that fullest enquiries will he made before any money is expended. Should this he so it will be felt that much has been achieved, and that a plan for squandering of public money has been frustrated. I am, etc.. 1). DENNEHY. Matainui, Oct. Bth, 1927.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19271008.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 8 October 1927, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
398

CORRESPONDENCE. Hokitika Guardian, 8 October 1927, Page 2

CORRESPONDENCE. Hokitika Guardian, 8 October 1927, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert