ARBITRATION COURT
TUESDAY. AUGUST 9th. (Before His Honour, Air Justice Frazer, with him Messrs \Y. Scott, and A. L. Monteith, employers’ and workers' representatives respectively). The Court sat at 10 a.m. CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION. \Y. Lloyd v. Malfroy and Coy.. Ltd. Mi* .Murdoch appeared for plaintifl and Mi* Kitchiiigliam for defendant. Mr Murdoch for plaintiff said'the ease had been settled between the parties. Tin* ease involved considerable conflict of medical evidence, and in view of this, counsel had arranged a. settlement in favour <d plaintill for £lO5, Ho asked that judgment by consent should la* entered tor that
sum. any question ot costs to lie settled between counsel. His Honour gave judgment. for plaintill' in terms of the application. The Court then adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19270809.2.44
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 9 August 1927, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
123ARBITRATION COURT Hokitika Guardian, 9 August 1927, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in