RIGHT TO SHINGLE
BERLIN, June 9. An apprentice in the dress department of a. Cologne shop was lately dismissed on the ground that she had her hair shingled. Being a spirited young woman she sued her employed in the Cologne commercial court. The employer declared that if was si perfectly well-known rule in his establishment that cropped hair was forbidden. The apprentice stated that she had had her hair cut ofT with the approval of her parents on health grounds. The court took the side oi tilt 1 girl and ordered her employer to reinstate her an the ground that shingling was not a sufficient reason for annulling articles of apprenticeship.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19270728.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 28 July 1927, Page 1
Word count
Tapeke kupu
111RIGHT TO SHINGLE Hokitika Guardian, 28 July 1927, Page 1
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in