Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ONAKAKA IRON

“ HAVING A BAD RUN.” WELLINGTON, August 4. A -.bonus of 30s per ton on the production of iron from the Onakaka. works, Golden Ray. is apparently insufficient to develop this industry in New. Zealand and there was considerable' demand by members in the House to-day for an increased duty on imported iron. It was stated that Indian pig iron can be landed in New Zealand at £0 2s (Id a ton and that it

cost more to bring New Zealand iron to Wellington than pig iron from India. It was suggested by Mr E. J. Howard (Christchurch South)" that instead of prohibiting the importation of iron it would be preferable to let the people know exactly what tho New Zealand iron industry was costing tihem hv increasing tho subsidy on production even if it meant £3 per ton. Mr 'Hudson (Motueka): They have not asked for that. The Hon G. J. Anderson, Minister of Mines, expressed the opinion that the iron manufacturing industry in New Zealand was certainly having a bad

run. A good deal Had been done for the Onakaka. Company, which was faced with a powerful corporation in India producing iron at a very low cost. The company had considered whether it was possible to keep them out of the market, and Cabinet had tho matter

under consideration, though ho was not in a position to say what might he done. The company did not ask for an increased subsidy, but some tariff protection. The subsidy was increased not in its total, but by making larger payments per ton spread over a shorter period. When this took place the importer of Indian iron, a gentleman wellknown in Dunedin, reduced the price and the Onakaka Company then asked the Government to vary the conditions by paying so much in bonus and so much in duty. A ]>oint for the Government’s consideration was that v\hile the Indian Government' was paying export bonus on this iron and New Zealand was paying a bonus on its own iron it was not so easy to apply the dumping duty clause. What Cabinet would finally decide lie was not in a position to say.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19260806.2.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 6 August 1926, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
362

ONAKAKA IRON Hokitika Guardian, 6 August 1926, Page 1

ONAKAKA IRON Hokitika Guardian, 6 August 1926, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert