CAPTAIN’S REPLY

Hokitika Guardian, 25 January 1926, Page 4

CAPTAIN’S REPLY

AI!A TV A'S VOLUNTEER CR FAY

AUCKLAND, January 22

•• 1 was astonished to read the reported complaints of the volunteer crew.” said (amain T. Warren Jones, commander of the R.M.S. Arawa. whim interviewed tn-dav concerning the allegations of bad treatment made by some of the men who took the Arawa to England during the British seamen’s strike.

■■ln the first place it should he understood that these men volunteered to

take the ship to England,” said the captain. -They saw the quarters they were to occupy and knew the conditions of employment. They must have realised that they were entering upon an unaccustomed Ido under conditions which would lie strange to them. I recognised this, and did h\ host, to alleviate those conditions tor them during the homeward voyage. They wore treated exceptionally well, and there were no complaints.”

In proof of ibis statement. Captain Jones produced a telegram which he received from, volunteers while in London asking him and his officers to accept their ‘‘sincere thanks for considerate treatment during the voyage.”

The telegram concluded. " Cabling to this effect- to Prime Minister of New Zealand.”

The trip home ended happily and sincere valedictory speeches were made between the volunteer crew and Captain Jones. 11 In these speeches the men thanked me and my officers for what had been done for them, and I thanked them on behalf of the company for all they had done to bring the ship safely home.” continued Captain Jones. “Before leaving Panama the men were given the option of returning to New Zealand within three weeks or later, and berths were arranged in the Arawa for those who wished to return immediately. The company granted them a lump sum of money for maintenance and expenses, which in some cases wa.Sj spent within the first two days. After that they were lodged and looked after jointly by the company and the High Commissioner.”

“ Then, as originally agreed upon, they were brought hack as third-class passengers. As such they were treated. They had. of course, to conform to the discipline of the ship. Some slight difference arose among themselves on the voyage hack. ‘When this was reported to me T had to deal with it for the comfort of the large complement of passengers which the ship carried. This may he the reason why one or more of the disgruntled ones made the .statement attributed to them.”

I Questioned concerning the men’s allegation that they were afforded no protection on arriving home. Captain Jones expressed the utmost surprise that the men should have said anything on this score. “ The statement that they were given no protection is absolutely wrong, as there was no trouble, not even a sign of trouble, on the arrival of the vessel. The men were met hv a representative of the company and arrangements were made for them to go to the company’s office, where things were arranged for them in connection with their stay and return voyage. T know there was no trouble, as T was on the ship all the time and could not get away for two hours after berthing by reason of arrangements- which had to be made.”