Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHEAT CROPS.

COST OF production. ASH BFRTOX. Oct. 31. Sonic figures relating Lo the cost of production of uheat in Australia arc '’supplied by Air G. W. bendley. of Elgin. who writes as follows: I have received some interesting figures which have been collected in Australia regarding the cost of growing wheat in the various States. Knnucrand others interested in wheat-growing may find them useful for purposes of comparison with our own (Xew Zealand) costs. The details nre:Suiuli Australia—Turrotlichl Experimental Farm, whose accounts arc kept by (nmpeteiit accouirtants. arc as follows for a tour years’ average Land value, til ds (id per acre; cost per acre, including everything, viz.. interest at ■"> per cent, depreciation, general expenses, cost of cultivation and harvesting. £-1 5s (id. Last years’ average, twenty-four bushels-—equal to 3s 7d per bushel. Xew .'south Wales—Land valued at ■£o per acre; cost. £2 5s (no allowance made for wages of farmer) ; yield. 19.7 bushels per acre—'is 4d per bushel. If farmer's wages arc included, add £1 per acre, making 3s Id per bushel ; hut if the land is of the same valuation as Turretfiold. cost per bushel is Is. Victoria—On land C 8 per acre, on same basis as Xew South Wales, yield twenty bushels per aero, cosl of growing. without tanner's: wages, 2s C!Jd: wages allowance of £1 per acre, cost 3s fid per bushel. 'l'o many Nc.v Zealand farmers the yields per acre in the above returns will be a surprise, as we have been led to believe that Australian yields are often very low. It must, however. I>e remembered that during the last decade or more the Australian system of farming has greatly changed and improved. The liberal use of superphosphate (which, by the way. is much cheaper than in Netv Zealand), and the svstem of alternating wheat with bare fallow, have resulted in greatlv increasing the average vield.

The figures given in the return ate rather meagre, hut still may servo for purposes of comparison, and lie instructive to our wheat-growers.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19251103.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 3 November 1925, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
336

WHEAT CROPS. Hokitika Guardian, 3 November 1925, Page 2

WHEAT CROPS. Hokitika Guardian, 3 November 1925, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert