Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROHIBITION

The principal business of a meeting ol the Council ot Christian Congregations last night was a debate on the following motion : ‘•That Prohibition odors the only practical solution of the evils of the liquor traHie.’’ Although the motion was carried, the debate was remarkable tor the billowing outspoken remarks by two of the clergy present: ” I lonestlv 1 consider this debate a verv solemn iarce.” sard Archileaeou 'Lavlor. ” You know exactly whai the result is going to be. Two speakers have enjoyed tire luxury of preaching to t lie already converted. The already come rted have obviously enjoyed themselves.” Archdeacon lavlor said he wanted to appeal to reason and intellect. and not to emotion. There was jus| the danger in the movement with which the majority of those present were concerned of alienating sympathy not only for the cause of prohibition, but also for the cause of religion, because of this appeal to emotion. I here

“A Very Solemn Farce.” Church Council Debate. i Prom " l.vfteltuii Times.” September 23rd. l'J‘2o.)

ivore ■one sober people who were convinced that prohibition was not a remedy; there were some who were convinced if was not practical, and t here were quite a lot who were convinced it was not the only remedy. There- were people who held that prohibition was neither possible nor desirable. They believed it was possible bv controlling the sale to diminish abuses caused by excessive use. and they felt tliaL they had a right to trust their fellow-citizens to carry oil tlml. general trend in the direction of sobriety which bad marked the lasi few generations. The Bov. C. Berry, said he believed in temperance and lie could not change to this new thing, prohibition. Ho preferred to stick by the old gospel of temperance rather than work under He ha liner of heresy, which was prohibition. Temperance and prohibition could no! march together. Prohibition \as not a success. They did not have go to America--it was failing in Asbburtoii.—v

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19250929.2.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 29 September 1925, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
332

PROHIBITION Hokitika Guardian, 29 September 1925, Page 1

PROHIBITION Hokitika Guardian, 29 September 1925, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert