Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Til HR SI) AY SFPT. Bub. ißelore W. Meldnim. Fsq.. S M.) _ DKFFXCF ACT. Leonard A. Ap|>ii-toii wa- ‘'barged with failiue to register under the Ait. After hearing evideme lhe charge was disiiiissod. ,)„ similar charge A. Stnplorth. did not appear and was fined ■> , ami LKT.XSINC ACT. On a rbarge ol being on licensed premises (C Inb llolell after hours, a resident of Pimu lor alioie Mr -Mur,l,,eh appeared pleaded not guilty. Alter hearing delcmlaiii the Hiaige dlMts i %: si*(l. AiK.tjH*!- nl -im«h,, |v I Imrged (Club llond). Ordered to pay eosis ,s. A local resident on a similar charge (Club Hotel) pleaded mu 'O', illy and after bearing evidence the case was dismissed.

OTHER CHARLES. \ (: di me elmrged with i otiiinitting a nuisance in I’evell "livct was iine, | -jits and i-,m- fs. The Police (barged Mall >"11 til. with in,l having a li Hit alter sunset, on bis motor-ear. Fined os and costs SEPARATION ORDER. The adjourned application for a separation older Emily T. Cooke Mr Joyce) V. A. 11. B. Cooke (Mr Sellers) was further dealt with. Mr Sellers stated that defendant had entered a suit tor restitution ol conjugal rights. There lad been no possibility of all arrangement being made , between the parties. Beth Counsel addressed the Court on the law point' involved. Mix Worship reserved lit' derision nil snturdav next at 10 "'clock.

DEBT CASES. .1 p. Kirwan 'Mr F.leock) v. Mm O'Brien claim for L"J DC ihl. Judgment tor plaiiuitf with Jis ltd costs. Addisons Mr El cock) v. Henry Shtind claim tor Ltd H-s oil. Judgment for plaintiff with costs C2 14s. Irvine and Stevenson Ltd (Mr Edcork) v. M. Jiijili t*mi. iutluinent siun* moils Co EL lid. No order. .1. ,1 Morgan -Mr Murdoch) v. E. O'Eee Mr Sellers, claim. Cs Ss. Judgment for plaintiff with costs C2 •’«. DE PO s TTI NT; SATV H UST. Inspeet- r of Fisheries v. Kanieri Sawmill Coy Ltd iMr Pilkington) a charge of allowing sawdust to he deposited in Hokitika river on May sth. s'ergt. King said at the instigation of the Marine Department prosecutions were oommemed and then adjourned. Evidence was given by J. Foote, Sergt. King and D. P Stuart Fined 4G« and oosts VM,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19250910.2.34

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 10 September 1925, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
372

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Hokitika Guardian, 10 September 1925, Page 3

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Hokitika Guardian, 10 September 1925, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert