Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE WATERHOUSE CASE

AUSTRALIAN AND N.Z. CABLE ASSOCIATION JUDGMENT FOR £12.000 LONDON, March 23. Mr Justice Shearman, summing up in the Waterhouse case, said that if the payments to Lady Wilson Barker were made properly and innocently, why had not Lady Wilson Barker explained the transactions in evidence? The jury decided that Lady Wilson Barker obtained 23 payments front Waterhouse by means of fraudulent representations, but held there was no conspiracy with Sheldon. Air Justice Shearman entered judgment against the Wilson Barkers for £12,075. He pointed out that, though lie thought the law ought to he altered a husband was still responsible for his wife’s torts. Sheldon was dismissed from the suit with costs.

i-ATEST CABLE NEWS

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19250325.2.17.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 25 March 1925, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
117

THE WATERHOUSE CASE Hokitika Guardian, 25 March 1925, Page 2

THE WATERHOUSE CASE Hokitika Guardian, 25 March 1925, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert