Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE DENTISTOUN CASE

FRENCH MAID’S EVIDENCE. AOaTBALIAN AND N.Z. CAULK ABSOCJATIOH. (Received this day at 12..‘30 p.m.) LONDON, March 17. An attack of sciatica prevented Dennistoiin attending the court, so other evidence was interposed. Marguerite Pyrronnene (formerly • plaintiff's French maid), gave c\ idenco that plaintiff often described liolin as her lover. He visited her at the bungalow at Boxhill. Witness did not see anything wrong. She was only stating what plaintiff had told her. Witness had seen both Cov.'ans and liolin in plaintiff’s flats in London. Once Cowans arrived unexpectedly when liolin was there, and witness, under plaintiff’s instructions, took liolin to the basemeht til! Cowans “ got out of the way,” which was not long. Plaintiff once said she did not like him as a brother. Witness once alludDeiinistoun as a husband, she just loved ed to the dirtiness of plaintiff’s dressing gown, and the plaintiff explained that it was due to her putting it on the floor so that the caretaker would not hoar Bolin’s footsteps when he was going out late at night or early in the morning. Plaintiff at the Hits* Hotel -Paris, in lf)20, told witness she had been'talking to her husband, with a view to arranging a divorce, after which she intended marrying liolin. Witness considered the plaintiff and I] ini ill were living as man and wile in the fullest sense of the term, during their stay in Barcelona in 1921. While plaintiff was in Barcelona, Cowans telegraphed that he was ill, and would like to see her, hut she did not go. been use she did not like to hurt llolin’s feelings. •wans later angrily telegraphed cursing her because she had been a heartless deceiver.

Witness, - '' cross-examined, declared she was giving her evidence in order to prevent the plaintiff harming anyone. She had banned the witness by making lerrible charges against lew. She admitted she was given a good character later.

The remainder of the day was occupied with the testimony of former maids, also Cowans’ ohniili'eur, relating to plaintiff’s associations with S.mliousc, Bolin and Prince Odescalchi. In adjourning the hearing, Justice MeCardic commented oil the apparent impassibility of finishing this week.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19250318.2.22.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 18 March 1925, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
359

THE DENTISTOUN CASE Hokitika Guardian, 18 March 1925, Page 3

THE DENTISTOUN CASE Hokitika Guardian, 18 March 1925, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert