THE DENTISTOUN CASE
FRENCH MAID’S EVIDENCE. AOaTBALIAN AND N.Z. CAULK ABSOCJATIOH. (Received this day at 12..‘30 p.m.) LONDON, March 17. An attack of sciatica prevented Dennistoiin attending the court, so other evidence was interposed. Marguerite Pyrronnene (formerly • plaintiff's French maid), gave c\ idenco that plaintiff often described liolin as her lover. He visited her at the bungalow at Boxhill. Witness did not see anything wrong. She was only stating what plaintiff had told her. Witness had seen both Cov.'ans and liolin in plaintiff’s flats in London. Once Cowans arrived unexpectedly when liolin was there, and witness, under plaintiff’s instructions, took liolin to the basemeht til! Cowans “ got out of the way,” which was not long. Plaintiff once said she did not like him as a brother. Witness once alludDeiinistoun as a husband, she just loved ed to the dirtiness of plaintiff’s dressing gown, and the plaintiff explained that it was due to her putting it on the floor so that the caretaker would not hoar Bolin’s footsteps when he was going out late at night or early in the morning. Plaintiff at the Hits* Hotel -Paris, in lf)20, told witness she had been'talking to her husband, with a view to arranging a divorce, after which she intended marrying liolin. Witness considered the plaintiff and I] ini ill were living as man and wile in the fullest sense of the term, during their stay in Barcelona in 1921. While plaintiff was in Barcelona, Cowans telegraphed that he was ill, and would like to see her, hut she did not go. been use she did not like to hurt llolin’s feelings. •wans later angrily telegraphed cursing her because she had been a heartless deceiver.
Witness, - '' cross-examined, declared she was giving her evidence in order to prevent the plaintiff harming anyone. She had banned the witness by making lerrible charges against lew. She admitted she was given a good character later.
The remainder of the day was occupied with the testimony of former maids, also Cowans’ ohniili'eur, relating to plaintiff’s associations with S.mliousc, Bolin and Prince Odescalchi. In adjourning the hearing, Justice MeCardic commented oil the apparent impassibility of finishing this week.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19250318.2.22.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 18 March 1925, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
359THE DENTISTOUN CASE Hokitika Guardian, 18 March 1925, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.