Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NATIONALITY QUESTION

AC ST It M. IAN A Nil N.Z. CABLE ASSOCIATION LONDON. Feb. 18. The House of Commons discussed, and ultimately adopted a private member’s motion submitted hv Major N. E. Harvey (Conservative, Totues) catling attention to the status of British ’million marrying aliens, and expressing the opinion that a British woman should not lose, or he deemed to lose, her nationality by the mere act ol marriage, hut should bo entitled to dodare alienage. I lie mover pointed out the mniiv existing anomalies and bari-shi-s so lie red hv British women marrying nationals of some foreign countries. particularly North America amt South America. Dr G l.ocker-f.ampsou (l ndei-bu-returv for tlie Home Office) said that proposals lmd been submitted to tin km.inio.is and if an agreement were reached .relief legislation could bo passLt \laior llarvev .minted out that il a woman married an Argentinian a Brazilian, or a Chilian, she lost hei British nationality, hut in the L mt States she became an American only alter residing there lor a year with he husband, and moanwluie she was n t entitled to British protection. Conversely a foreign woman ought to satis fv the authorities that she was a desirable person to become the wife of a Britisher. This would prevent the present marriages of undesirable Imcijrn women in order to escape depot tation penalties. . Sir L. I. ncker-Lampsoii pointed out , that a sub-committee of the linperia Coilferenee of 1923 had adapted a usolution that, the principle of the existing law ought to lie maintained, exccp. that a woman should he readmitted to British nationality where the marriage state .though olhemlly existing, had practically terminated 1 his along with another suggestion by a lainamentarv Joint Committee that a 'woman should not lose her British natioinalitv unless she was enabled to acquire that of her alien husband, was submitted to the Dominions last year.

Newfoundland alone, so ‘' \„■ t wa , practically impossl do to oca. Jvitl, Uie question on tin- Imos -m »».t----,nnlt.ss the Dominions agutd l-t looininiendeil tbcUouse to ™^ in _ ions tcpij " ■ ,i r. vtassen able, then legislation lould to 1 i 1 n media t e ly. a ,-nr~

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19250220.2.25.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 20 February 1925, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
359

NATIONALITY QUESTION Hokitika Guardian, 20 February 1925, Page 3

NATIONALITY QUESTION Hokitika Guardian, 20 February 1925, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert