Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TAXATION.

■ADDRESS BY Alt? F. J ROLLFSTON, ALP.

TIMA It U, November IS.

At to-night’s meeting of tin: South Canterbury Chamber of Commerce, an address was given by Mr F. .J. Rolleston, M.P., on the report of the Taxation Commission.

Mr .Holloston said that, excepting the chairman, who was a Judge of the Supreme Court, three out of the four members ol the 102-1 Commission had been members of the previous Commission, as might therefore have been expected, did not diller very greatly from that of the previous one. it would have been better had the Commission of 1021 been wider in its scope and contained in its personnel representatives of other classes besides the commercial community. As a result the evidence offered had been largely that of one class of taxpayer, and necessarily the conclusions of the Commission were not its vtilutiblo as they alight have been. After summarising the recommendations of the Commission with regard to income-tax, the speaker went on to deal with the laud tax. He said that, the Commissioners had. without giving any detailed reasons, merely teconuiieiided the abolition ol the lalnltax and. the graduated fax, and suggested in its place a graduated incometax uii all income Iron) land. The present law was that land in the cities paid only laud and income-tax, while land held for farming, unless it was leased, was subject to land-tax only. As to Hie practical effect of tins recommendation the land-tax assessed for the last year was roughly one and •i-half millions, whereas the income-tax from farm lands in any one year would not exceed £210,000. therefore, the abolition of the land-tax, and the substitution of the income-tax would at the present time, involve a loss ol revenue of one and a-qunrter millions, which would, have to he made up by an increase of the income-tax oi b> soluo indirect tnxntimi. Mr Kolleston adduced a number of arguments in favour of the land-tax, ~mt concluded by saying that it was safe to say that there was no (.Jinnee in the near future of this recommendation being carried into elleet.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19241121.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1924, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
350

TAXATION. Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1924, Page 4

TAXATION. Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1924, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert