Tin- rate at which the local body indchteitiX'S throughout New Zoahriil has I .ecu mounting lias caused a good of criticism of late. r lhe oresumvtion is that additional restraint would command more general support than the lonioval of what little now exists, a.s was advocated in Auckland There is. of course, no guarantee that the amalgamation of local authorities would in itself l.riiig about leforin. A recasting of the same material in another mould is not to he compared with the substitution of a limner class material. That the public is satislied with the present material seems, however, to he shown by its indisposition to change it. In reply, it may be nroed that the opportunity seldom cfors of a change for the better. “Dunedin Star.”
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19241112.2.30.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 12 November 1924, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
127Page 3 Advertisements Column 2 Hokitika Guardian, 12 November 1924, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in