FINED £120.

Hokitika Guardian, 15 July 1924, Page 1

FINED £l2O.

I’PXALTIKS IXKI.It TKD OX d I3HYCP, dliXlOt:. WKI.I.IXGTOX. duly 1-.

The Bi.iard of the Xeu Trot till'; A.ssoeiatien. which usually meets in ( hristehiireh, held its jiioiithJy meeting at \\ ellingtnn on I nursdtty. .Mr C. p. .Mink submitted proposals for the more effective registration oi horses. These will comprise diagrams showing all markings on a horse, including hrauds. sears, etc. Ihe 1 ro-po'-als Were approved. In reyard to the case ol Millie Liutoln. who "-in a nee in the name of p.ulius at Gisborne, it was resolved that in view of the lint that no evidence liatl been adduced to the contrary. the Board had no other course hut to accept the statements of .lames Bryce. Sour., and Andrew Bivce that tlk-v were not aware of the identity of Willie Lincoln when raced at Gisborne.

It was further resolved that dames Brvee. Sour.. having admitted tho purchase ‘>l a horse from John Smith of t.auristoii. in April. 1020. and reselling such liorse to It. d. I iddy. of Hawera. at a profit, and whereas lie registered the transfer trout Smith direct to It. d. Tidily, thus committing a broach of rule I.VJ. he lo fined the maximum penalty of £2O. Bryce was also lined for broaches of Rule li?r. in connection with the name “Hit-hard .Tames,” the total amount of fines in this connection not to exceed £oO. Bryce was further fined £2O for each hreach ol Rule 130 in ennneot ion with the nnn-rcgistrntinn or joint- interests, the total amount not to exceed £oO. This means that Bryce Pour., was fined a total sunt of £l2O.