Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE LABOUR WOULD.

SHOP ASSISTANTS’ DEMAND. '" r * liY T HI, ECU Al-11 —l*ll ESS ASSN., COl’YltlOllT. WELLINGTON. .March 1. The Dominion industrial dispute concerning shop assistants was advanced a further stage to-day when arguments from both sides were heard by the Arbitration Court. A plica lion is made by the employees for a Dominion award, covering the Auckland. Wellington, Nelson. Otago and Canterbury Industrial districts. !n opening for the workers. Mr CYoskery said the Conciliation Council had beer, unable to decide on the number of clauses in view of the drastic changes made by the Court on the last occasion, and further changes wore asked for by the employers. On this occasion lie asked at the outset that the Court should not base the new award upon the Christchurch agreement, which he characterised a* a, disgrace.

Mr Hammond resented the remark, claiming that the agreement was just in every particular. The employers’ ease he said would lie based mi that agreement. Air .Justice Fraser pointed out that the Court laid added a memorandum to the Christchurch award, stating it was not to b otaken as a precedent in other disputes. Air Crosk-ery said ihc employees desired that the departmental manageresses should receive extra remuneration according to the extra responsibility entailed. 11l support of his claim that porters should again lie provided for in the * shop assistants award, he called three witnesses to show the wages received by such workers at present, and the bonuses and deductions they had been subjected to since tliev were previously included in tbo award. Regarding the wages claims, the Union advocate submitted a graduated seale for the managers and manageresses according to responsibility. \Ninihnv dressers’ wages were based upon those of departmental managers, as pmvid.-d in the last award. Provision whs sought making it clear that a. worker should not suffer in comparison with another of the same period of service Through a transfer to another dr pertinent. Th ■ .fudge gave an assurance that the clause affected would not be interpreted ia such a. manner. HOTEL WORKERS’ AWARD. WELLINGTON. March 4. A Dominion award was made by the Arbitration Court to-day. covering the -■ conditions of employment of the licensed hotel workers of New Zealand. The matter had previously been considered in the Conciliation Council, and a fid! agreement was arrived at on all points, there remaining only the formal work of i l "' award by the Arbitration Court.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19240305.2.22

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 5 March 1924, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
403

THE LABOUR WOULD. Hokitika Guardian, 5 March 1924, Page 2

THE LABOUR WOULD. Hokitika Guardian, 5 March 1924, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert