Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

AUSTRALIAN AND N.Z. CAULK ASSOCIATION. CHEAPER BEER WANTED IN BRITAIN. LONDON, April 21. In the House of Commons, Colonel Guest, in committee on the Budget, moved to reduce the Government’s contribution and to increase the brewers’ contribution towards the lowering of tho price of beer. Mr Muring, in seconding the amendment, said that if the brewers Imre the whole cost of the duty remitted, they still have profits totalling ll] per rent. Commander Bel lairs said he wanted to see the price of beer reduced by twopence per pint. High-priced beer produced discontent;. It should lie the Conservative Government’s first object to alter this.

Mr S. Baldwin (the Chancellor ot the Exchequer) in replying, justified his arrangements with the brewers, as the reimposition of the war-time system of control was the only other means of ensuring to the consumer the benefit of the tax reduction. The beer consumption was twenty-six million bulk barrels. This was much below the pre-war iigure. The -brewers contribution must come from the increased consumption that would result and the decreased overhead charges. Tiio present quality would bo maintained.

IN THE COMMONS. (lleeeived this dav id. 8.30 a.m.) LONDON, April 23. Mr Boyd Carpenter, replying to qestions in tlic Commons, said direct taxation under the new budget amounted to £lO 2s Id per capita and indirect taxation to £3 10s. The Commons by 170 votes to 137, rejected n motion to reduce the tea duty from eight-pence to live pence per pound. LONDON. April 23. The Commons by 218 to 100, defeated a motion to abolish the duty on dried fruits. LONDON, April 23 Mr Baldwin in reply to a question in the Commons said fees and stamp <1 iities ranging from £270 sterling in tlie case of n baronet to £7OO sterling in the case of a duke, were imposed on the creation of hereditary honours, lie would not consent to introduce a tax on title names, because it wotdd be insufficiently revenue producing.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19230426.2.21.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 26 April 1923, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
332

HOUSE OF COMMONS. Hokitika Guardian, 26 April 1923, Page 3

HOUSE OF COMMONS. Hokitika Guardian, 26 April 1923, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert