Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNIQUE CASE.

AFFILIATION CLAfAf

[ nv TKI.Ef.'RAfII —I’UR PRESS ASSOCIATION]

AUCKLAND, Feb 9. A ease said to bo unique •<> New Zealand law annals, was heard by Mr Gotten. S.M.. in the Magistrate’s Court to-day, when an affiliation order was sought by a young married woman against Kongipotiri Marunmni, described as a first-grade licenced interpreter, who did not appear. Counsel for the complainant stated that both the complainant and her bushand were white. The husband was engaged by dclendant at CO a wee’; to

work on his farm at Rata, u nr Marton, and was given a house on the property. The lmsLanil ma-le eeaistjuil reference to being in love with a woman in England, and lie frequenily urged his wife to go to the defendant, so that lip could go to the other woman. About August. 192‘), the l:v(> men met at a cottage. sp tiding several boor* setiling the term- dan f nl m u diuary transaction, namely. Mint the husband should depart and leave his wife to the defendant, in consideration ot a large sum of money believed t<> be C !(.,). The husband left, but, about two o clock on the fourth morning In returned, entering the cottage through a window—the Maori and the woman meanwhile lived as husband and wife. Thu husband stated: "ft was no good to him." as the cheque had proved to be valueless. 1 The two men then spent the remainder of the night in conversation m the kitchen, the complainant passing the time crying in bed. The husband thru resumed his former relationship with his wife. In May, 1921. a child was born, which was an obvious half-caste. \ft or complainant had given evidence on the lines of counsel's statement, the Magistrate adjourned the case for a. fortnight, to allow the husband to be notified of the proceedings.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19230210.2.25

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 10 February 1923, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
305

UNIQUE CASE. Hokitika Guardian, 10 February 1923, Page 3

UNIQUE CASE. Hokitika Guardian, 10 February 1923, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert