Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NEAR EAST.

AUSTRALIAN AND N.Z. CABLE ASSOCIATION. .ENGLISH PRESS CRISIS. LONDON, Feb 5. The diplomatic correspondent of the “Daily Chronicle” returns to the old question of French responsibility regarding the deadlock at Lausanne. He states: Without unfairness or prejudice, the blame for the breakdown can ho attributed mainly to AI. Poincare’s unfortunate, mischievous last-hour intervention; hut there the French power for mischief lias possibly been exhausted. The French have nothing more to oifer. Their power in helping the Turks i.s exhausted. Britain has much to offer, in peace or war. if the Turks want peace, Britain is the solo Power to assist them on to their feet. If they want war. Britain h:-s the power of life and death ever Turkey. All this i.s known to the Turks. Their object, it may be presumed, is a separate peace with Britain. The “Daily Express” says: It is ridiculous to imagine we will use tho British Navy or recall to the trenches men of the British race in order to change the complexion of the, Turkish judicature. This would only happen if the Turks are mad enough to attack British troops. There i.s no reason to believe they will he mad enough lor that.

TURKEY’S ATT IT U DF.. LONDON. Feb 4. The “Morning Post” Lausanne correspondent asys:—“The French .and the Italians are more annoyed than tho British over the Turkish obstinacy in connection with the finances and the capitulations, which touch them more than they do Britain. The difieience is illustrated by tho final words at the Conference, Lord Curzon tolling Isiuet Pasha that the Turkish mtraetibilitv was incredible, and M Bompnrd saving it was a crime* to talk of separate treaties. . Lsinet Pasha informed Turkish jomiimlists that he did not refuse to sign owing to the Capitulations, but owing to tho financial section of the trea which meant the re-establishment ot the economic capitulations, and tho enslavement of Turkey. He claimed that he was aware that the conference was over, and declared that he expected a further communication from the Allies. Ismet concluded: —“My conscience is ‘ -I Tho French delegation is leaving for Paris.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19230206.2.18.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 6 February 1923, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
355

THE NEAR EAST. Hokitika Guardian, 6 February 1923, Page 2

THE NEAR EAST. Hokitika Guardian, 6 February 1923, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert