Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AGAINST MONOPOLIES

STRINGENT PROPOSALS IN N.S.W SYDNEY, Oct. 12

Labour supporters in Now South Wales have boon making a great outcry against the expressed intention of the Government to repeal the Profiteering Act, a measure of the late Labour Government intended to save the workers from the operation of unduly high prices. Tt was contended that, the repeal of the Act would leave the workers at the mercy of profiteers. Tlio Nationalist Government, however. now proposes to go even further than its predecessors in this matter, and while doing away with tell Profiteering Act. it will introduce legislation of a kind previously unknown in New South Wales, for the repression of harmful monopolies and restraints of trade. The new Bill provides that any person is guilty of an offence who monopolises or attempts to monopolise, or combines or conspires with any other person to monopolise the production or manufacture of, or the trade or commerce in anv commodity or article of commerce, or the supply of any services. Every contract made or entered into contravention of this provision shall he illegal and void. A penalty of CSOO ie provided for an offence under the Act, and a second offence shall he indictable, with a penalty of CSOO, or 12 months’ imprisonment. In the ease of a corporation, tin* fine for a first offence is £SOO, and for a second offence £IOOO. Provision is made for a Supreme Court injunction to prevent a harmful monopoly or “arrangement” from continuing its operations. The penalty is a fine up to €SOO a day for each dav during which the offence continues. Anybody injured by a monopoly or trade arrangement may sue for damages and recover treble damages.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19221020.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 20 October 1922, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
284

AGAINST MONOPOLIES Hokitika Guardian, 20 October 1922, Page 1

AGAINST MONOPOLIES Hokitika Guardian, 20 October 1922, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert