Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Communion Cup.

DANGER OF DISEASE. SYDNEY. September 20. The dinger of disease in connexion with the use of the common Communion Cup lias been emphasised during the past week, which has been a period of propaganda to draw public attention to health matters generally. After dealing with the number of diseases known to lie communicated through the lips and mouth. Dr Read pointed out that it was an extraordinary anomaly that people ill churches, when they used a common Communion Cup, did what was forbidden in bars and refreshment rooms. It was possib-

!y true that no case of infection had ever been traced to a Communion Cup, but this did not. mean that such had never boon the case. He had not made a bacteriological examination of a Communion Cup, but the “cleansing eipth” had been examined and had boon found to Ik* swarming with bacteria. Many of the clergymen said that no harm could come to anyone taking pari, in siioli a holy service. That was all very well for those who held that view but what of .the others? It was admitted Unit faith was necessary, hut why put obstacles in the way of its exercise? •

It was quite time that our well-mean-ing clergy were educated in vital qtn s lions. They liad yet to learn that the investigator who used his brain fur humanity was the Almighty’s only agent in disease prevention and Hint it must ho wrong to disregard his warn ings. Quite apart from the risk cf infection, many people disliked the use of the common cup front a sense u f cleanliness. Giving the arguments on the other side, the Lambeth Conference of 1908. said the doctor, had obtained an opinion from “a high medical authority,” who stated that no case of infections disease had been traced to the common Communion Cup, and that lhe danger of its use was negligible. Many of H’e clergy, however, knew that persons wore prevented from taking communion by the fear of infection and for this reason they were opposed to the use of a common cup. Dr Read urged that the Church authorities should lie approached to devise some alternative method more in accord with the dictates of modern hygiene.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19220930.2.32

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 30 September 1922, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
374

Communion Cup. Hokitika Guardian, 30 September 1922, Page 4

Communion Cup. Hokitika Guardian, 30 September 1922, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert