Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Coxtixuixu his speech Mr Bonar Law, said :—I am a sincere friend of France. But, in a ease of this kind, if one does not talk frankly and say wluit he things it is better not to talk at all. Now that I am neither a member of a Government nor of an Opposition, what [ say hinds nobody hut myself. I do not believe that any British Government would not feel, that reasonable demands on Germany must be met. I was surprised, I admit, to find it stated that, according to the Treaty of Versailles, one of the Allies was entitled to take such action as entering the Ruhr alone. But if it is'true, just think wliat’follows. If one Ally is entitled to do something alone, another Ally is entitled to say, “I will have nothing to do with it.” Well, for England and Franco such a condition of J things would play directly into the j hands of our olej enemies—would lie ex- f aetlv what our old enemies want. A.' greater misfortune to France and England could not happen than wliat would develop from that. And it must not happen. We do not know—l dor.’ : if the Governments know until they have received the reports of the Re- . pnrntion Commission—how much Germany can pay. But 1 do know that there ought to be no difference of onin, ion that whatever they can pay they

must pay. There have always been between the host of friends differences of opniion. Tlie only way they can he got over is, as they were got over during the war, hy goodwill and good sense. 1 would say to the French friends that they may take it from mo that I am expressing the opinion of the whole British nation when 1 say that when these differences of opinion arise they are not due to indifference to tho French point of view, much less to any hostility. They are due to a real honest difference of opinion as to the best method of securing a result which we have in common. ,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19220720.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 20 July 1922, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
348

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 20 July 1922, Page 2

Untitled Hokitika Guardian, 20 July 1922, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert