Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Film Censorship.

MR JOLLIFFE’S REJOINDER

WELLINGTON, April 6

Mr William Jolliffe (film censor) was interviewed by a “New Zealand Times” representative with regard to the strong condemnation of the film censorship—as a principle rather than as regards its operation in New Zealand—by Mr John W. Hicks, junr., managing-director in Australasia for Paramount Pictures. “The point is,” said Mr Jolliffe, “that tlie standard of morality and humour is very different here from what it is in America, and we don’t want our standard to be lowered to theirs. I think that covers the ground and answers the whole speech. There is no doubt about, that ; the American standard of morality and humour is decidedly different from our standard in New Zealand.” 25 MILLION FEET CENSORED. Asked how many fet of film he had censored since he. took up the censorship in September, 1916, Mr Jolliffe looked up bis records and said that the total to date wasi 25,731,000 feet.

“Your signature must be very wellknown now to the picture theatre public of the Dominion,” said our reporter. “Yes,” replied Mr Jolliffe, adding that six feet of film, or 96 representations in all, go to make up the censor’s signature as shown with each motion picture exhibited in New Zealand. During the year ended March 31, ho stated, he had inspected 5,672,000 feet of film, which was some 90,000 feet short of his record for any one year. The biggest number of feet put through in any one year was 5,761,570 feet, in 1918, when they had a rush on to keep up with the large number of films then on circuit in the Dominion. During the past year he had “turned down” altogether 41 films, and made 193 “cuts” in others. He did not keep a record of the number of feet of film cut out in each

A BETTER CLASS OF FILM. “On the whole,” continued Mr Jolliffe, “I think we are getting a better class of film through now. There is more film coming from England now of course, than during the war. But it is mainly topicals and scemcs, and that sort of thing—small stuff; not much in the way of dramas. November last was an average month, and m that month we bad five British dramas, three comedies, and thirty-four topicals, totalling 50,000 feet in nil out of the 430,000 put through that month. 1 topicals were nearly half of the 50.000 feet.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19220407.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 7 April 1922, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
406

Film Censorship. Hokitika Guardian, 7 April 1922, Page 1

Film Censorship. Hokitika Guardian, 7 April 1922, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert