Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TIMBER ROYALTIES

A COMMISSION PROMISED. (Grey Star.) WELLINGTON, Febr nary 10. A clause added to the Finance Bill provides that a commission shall he appointed to inquire and report upon the extent to which the local authorities may incur loss of revenue from royalties, consequent on the passing of the Forests Act, 1921-22, and upon the provision which should consequently he made from the revenues of the State Forest services or otherwise. Mr Seddon urged the Premier to immediately set up a commission, as it was a matter of great importance to West Coast local bodies. Mr Massey replied that as the Fores,*., ,\ct did not come into operation till April 1, the commission could not be appointed till that date, hut it would be possible to get its report in time for next session. MI LUNG RIGHTS. The Legislative Council has agreed to amendments made in the Forests BiH by the House of Representatives. An important provision which has been added, safeguards milling rights granted under license by Wardens, and giving authority for application to Wardens to extend licenses over existing reservations. Other clauses were of a machinery nature. Dealing with the finance of the Department, Sir Francis Bell stated in regard to the first mentioned amendment that lie had proposed it with great reluctance, and only because it provided a measure of justice which seemed to be due. Sir K. Mitchelson and the Hon J. Grimmond protested against the amendment, which they thought was likely to endanger the forest. The leader of the Council insisted that he had not changed his opinion. Ho reluctantly moved the amendment, because it was just. If the clause were not added injustice would 4 oliow. There was a vested right by law which the amendment was intended to protect. He spoke as one who had sole authority in' the matter. The amendment which took away the Warden’s rights was not in the original Bill. The original amendment passed the House by accident, hut before it was submitted he expressed the opinion that it should be modified, and a modification had been made accordingly.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19220213.2.45

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 13 February 1922, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
351

TIMBER ROYALTIES Hokitika Guardian, 13 February 1922, Page 4

TIMBER ROYALTIES Hokitika Guardian, 13 February 1922, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert