Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FINANCE BILL.

'J PASSED BY HOUSE. SPECIAL TO GUARDIAN. WELLINGTON, Doe 16. S The House went into committee up--1 mi the Finance Bill early this afternoon 1 The leader of the Labour Party had ! stated he intended to “exhaust the J forms of the House” in opposing the J per cent, rebate of income tax and a increase in amusement tax, hut the I tlirentened stonewall did not become a 0 a serious affair. Mr Massey said he a was quite sure that the rebate mi inJ tax was a move ill the right dtr- *| eetioii. Nothing was injuring the pros--3 parity of tile Dominions more than the f excei-dinglv heavy taxation on incomes i and land. He desired to readjust taxaijj tion on incomes and land. He desited % tion so that it would not press s . lioav--j ilv on individuals. Sj '.Mr Veitcb (Wanganui) said some |1 wealthy people were putting their monv (iy into free ol income tax dehentwiics, fji which they bought Ht a depreciated c’ price and so were escaping taxation altogether. The consequence was that A business men who contributed tu the prosperity and development of the T country bad to. pay the taxation that :|] •eltby investors avoided. H Mr .Massey replied that the Dominion must stand by its bargain. Ibere was H no way of reducing the taxation at j present except by spreading it more i widely. j Liberal and Labour members opposed : the clause granting a rebate of income ' ) tax,' lint they did not carry their op’s position very far. A division was roach- ; • ed soon after mid-ttight. and the clause wats retained by A2 votes to 26. !] Mr Massey presented a new clause roll luting to the amusement tax. Tt projJ posed that tickets costing less than ■ ninepenee and under 2s 6d should pay y one nanny per shilling, or part of a - I shilling and, that tickets costing ovei As (}d should pay at the same rate plus is; an extra penny. A; Laliottr momhers made brief protest ly against this clause which was adopted i by A 8 votes to 18. The Hill was passed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19211217.2.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 17 December 1921, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
356

FINANCE BILL. Hokitika Guardian, 17 December 1921, Page 1

FINANCE BILL. Hokitika Guardian, 17 December 1921, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert