ARBUCKLE TRIAL
tUSTRAI.IAX AND N.Z. CAIII.E ASSOCIATION. THE .1 FRY UNDECIDED. (Received This Day at S.3H a.m.) SAN .FRANCISCO, Dec 3. Vfter tweiitv-l'our hours deliberation in the Arhui kie ease, the jury were unable to agree on a verdict. The prosecution announced tie' intention to ask Judge I it.-rl.ank to dismiss tho jury. while the defence declared they would resist the attempt. Mr NeNah.— I want them to deliberate until they reaelr a verdict. Various reports are current m regard to the jurv's delay, namely: One woman juror insists on a conviction and others that the jury arc divided into ten. two and seven, five, the majority in each ease resisting a.-quittaL
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19211205.2.29
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 5 December 1921, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
112ARBUCKLE TRIAL Hokitika Guardian, 5 December 1921, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in