Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FORESTS BILL.

SECOND HE A DIN'D DEBATE. SPECIAL TO GUARDIAN. 1 WELLINGTON, Nov. 23 The second rending of tho Forests i.ill occupied the Mouse this evening. .Meinhers had not much that was new 1 to say on the subject. They urged the importance of the protection of forests j on one hand, anil settlers and sawmillers on the other hand. The deflate t showed, its on other occasions, that ( there is some conflict between the Lands - Department and the Forestry Department and one may infer that at piesent the Lands Department is holding the-upper hand. ( Several members objected to the , weakening of the Bill by the Lands r Committee. They referred particularly ’ to the reduction of penalties for light- f ing lift's in State forests, and deletion | of the provision authorising forest officers to call upon all males to assist in ; lire lighting. The Minister for Lauds assured the House that the Bill was a workable measure and that it went quite as far as was considered advisable. He was ] willing to arrange for the measure to ( he referred to a Joint Committee after it reached tho Legislative Council if this was considered desirable. The Bill was read a second time. Mr Seddon (Westland) suggested that the Bill did not make sufficient provision for protecting the rights of the Local Bodies. An injustice had been d, )M e to his electorate by the reservation of large areas that otherwise would have paid Royalties. The Bill Stave too much power to the Government to ' legislate by means of Ordors-in-Council. > Miners were very anxious to know what provision was going to he made for the supply of the timber they required. They had been entitled in the past to . take timber from Crown lands for nuni *imr purposes, hut this privilege was ‘ being withdrawn, as far as the Slate \ forests were concerned. Mr Seddon added that the sawmilling industry deserved very fair coii- ' soleration. Thu sawmillers had considered the Bill carefully, hut uulorlinmtely the amendments they siiggcMcd had been shut out from cousidcra- ’ (■*,„ who* the Bill was before tho Lands * Committee. He trusted that a later opportunity would he provided tor <<'ii- * sideratio'n of these amendments.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19211123.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 23 November 1921, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
364

FORESTS BILL. Hokitika Guardian, 23 November 1921, Page 2

FORESTS BILL. Hokitika Guardian, 23 November 1921, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert