An Unusual Case.
A JUDGE'S COMMENT,
WELLINGTON. Nov. 17
'•You have c!imrf-C'-tl this man with j I:, ,1,1. | have asked in \ siiti lor some uhits of I.lint Hand "'here nic Llsoyasked Ml .1 list in' lloskmp when a soincw hat iinusna! case. an artmii hroupht by tin' coinniiUce ul inanapeiiu'll Lof the Feather-ton and Tiviuhen caniji canteens against lhoiiias thiltiuii 1 .Mason, I'laimino L'RFM, chiolly in 10nard In losses at llio ranU'olis, allepedh duo to neplipent in 1 1au.ihilout nmnape,limit hv tho dol'ondanl. was <• ailed on apaiu at tho Kuinoino ton ft to.lay. "You have si in ply proved that so nninh s[o"k was on hand when ho took over, and that so niilrh was not ail-minted for when he went out. You mipht aiiell say that a diteilor was to he hold i ospoiisj hie if a hidaui e-sheot which :e adopted did not show the Mime mimunt of poods at the end as at the bepinuillo of t he year.' Ml 0. lieeie. who appeared for tin plaint ill's, replied that had the losses turn .small, the matter would not hav home its present appoaiance. Ipto a cm tail! date tho oanti-ons had been run at. a profit : everythin” had pone all I iplli. • You ask me to diaw the inference that horauso a loss was made, till 1 dofciidaiil took tile poods;" asked lie .Honour. Mr licciv stated that lie wished m wiihdiuw the silpprstiou that the defendant iiad siippm-s.d .ei tain transactions. as had been alleged in the st;ttonteil l of elaiin. Tile detendalit was re,-alio! and ipiestionod as to certain details. ( oun-i'l then addressed tin' (ourt. Mr A. Cray, K.C.. wiio appenri d foi ill,, ill• ii'iid;ilit, held that the plaintiffs had aitopeiher failed to suiista.ntiate limit elaiin. lie expressed surpiise that Mason had mu been asked loi some explanation 1 dole not ion had !,< oil h-umel ed apniusi him li.v a eoiiiplaiiit to the polii e -pi ior t" I no hmnehinp ol the civil action). His Honour i cum iked that llieio si'i ini'ii to he no alhnuative eiideiui- as to where L'iOllt) worth oi poods had pone, whole they had been scored, oi how t hi*v weir consumed. Tamo was 0.,i e vidence that the books had been 1 alsitied. or that stork sheets were missitux. His Honour ruMotl Hun Ik' licit think tMI sell eulll 1 u it h inline;. -in any ease, by r. a-on oi the e' e !■■ mad - l>y l 1 "' c oupon system at tlie canteens. If fraud was aliened, fraud must he proved. His Honour said he would po carefully til t he ovidc-nee to see if there was anylhinp lo huar out the plaintilfs’ contention, thouph for the moment he could recall no wiiili point, on the main eliarpe, at anv rate.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19211121.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1921, Page 1
Word count
Tapeke kupu
467An Unusual Case. Hokitika Guardian, 21 November 1921, Page 1
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Hokitika Guardian. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.