Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CEMENT ENQUTRY.

Till'. < Hi 1 > K It OK I’lt l-’.KKII I'iNOK. I nv tki.kuiiai-u -run riiKsn association! W I’d/US' '.TON. October 1 I. A vvnrinnl tins hoon issued appoinlj 111 , i Commission under the t oinniissioiis of Kil.piil'V Act. IDOS. promised 1 1 \- t li<* (iovorumoiit to inl«» mid report upon the aIU-ti-il ions made , event lv ill the llollse ol Iteprcseutu,ives I.V Mr Musics. Ml’. (Strutlord) reintinti; to the production, distribution. i ill port n t ion mid pliers of cement dnrino certain ol the | emits of contiol exercised hy 'he Hoard of Trade. The warrant was si-turd this moraine hv the t tovenioi -(Jelteral. As 'previously stated the Commission is to lie under .1 listin' Sim. Tlte scope of tin- Commission "ns Hindi- available this at tel noon hy the Al inister of Industries and Commerce. It is us follows : - (1) Whether the Hoard of Trade in I>f loaQ^Ju-aiuidanniiitt^

maximum retail price o-i cement ol New Zealand manufacture of. £0 Bis (id per ton, ex-store Wellington, was guil- - of any imprompriety or of a grievous error of judgment. (2) \vhether the companies manufacturing cenieiit in N,-u Zealand ih r. ing the periol ol acute sict tape • - ,-enu'iit from the ISth. ot .fan: ary, hk.’il and thereafter took advantaig- ol L' * - excess of the demand over tin- sup >!v to -xto't onreasonahly high prices from the public. 05) Whether the agreement d-t - 1 At.h. May. 1021. set o“t in the ~-in-d !" hereto, const it ul ed the ' oflcii: c aevimi the Comnn'i'i-id 'iii"t» \et. Ibid, o" auv other Act. or was ill any way crint imil or illegal

Whether the pri'-e for cement of New Zealand manufacture was directly oi indirectly determined. ,a,ml ioiled. „r mllocncd by the parties i,, 1 hi' agreement in such a manner as to make H'o price imroasonalily high. (A) Whether tin, said agreement has in anv mannei- opei ated d t l imelitally to public interest. (0) Whether the Board cl Ir:'! ' la-ing aware ot such agreetnent. was lacking in any duty in taking no action w ith respect to sick agreement. The date upon which the Commission is to sit will In' decided 11 1 Air Justice Sim.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19211015.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 15 October 1921, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
366

CEMENT ENQUTRY. Hokitika Guardian, 15 October 1921, Page 1

CEMENT ENQUTRY. Hokitika Guardian, 15 October 1921, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert