Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHARGE ALTERED

AIANSLAUGHTER TO AI ORDER

A JUDGE ON “INTENT.”

An interesting discussion took place at Brisbane in the criminal sittings of the Supreme Court between the Chief Justine, Sir Pope Coopqr, and the Crown Prosecutor, Air Kingsbury, on tlie decision of the Judge that the prisoner before the court should be indicted on a more serious charge than the one preferred against him. Philip William Charles was charged with the murder of Herbert Aspinall at Imbil, near Gyrapie, in December last and Air Kingsbury explained that while an auction sale was proceeding at a dairy farm a young man named Ledger was knocked down by Aspinall, and Charles who was a couple of yards in the roar then picked up a stick and felled Aspinall, fracturing his skull.

His Honour: From what you «ay. it appears to me it is a case of wilful murder.

Air Kingsbury: Accused was u-t".ig under sudden passion, seeing his friend knocked down. His Honour: Does that entitle another man to pick up a stick and knock deceased’s brains out ? Air Kingsbury: Your Honour thinks on th e facts as I have opened that the intent must have been to kill? His Honour: I think so. Mr Kingsbury: In that case T enter a nolle proseque and present an ndietment for wilful murder. His Honour said he thought it would be necessary to have a new jury. He ‘thereupon adjourned the case, and instructed the jury empanelled not to discuss what they heard of Air Kingsbury’s opening, and not to give anyone the impression that Hie prisoner was in greater peril than before. He added that lie did not think a similar circumstance had arisen before in Queensland.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19210323.2.38

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 23 March 1921, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
284

CHARGE ALTERED Hokitika Guardian, 23 March 1921, Page 4

CHARGE ALTERED Hokitika Guardian, 23 March 1921, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert