Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT. HOKITIKA

SITTINGS AT HOKITIKA

His Honor Mr Justice Herdman will preside at the sittings o fthe Supreme Court at Hokitika on Thursday, March 31st, the following business being set down for hearing : CRIMINAL. Rex v. I. Aluir, theft. SUITS. Kapitea Goldfields Ltd., v. the King, petition of right, claim for damages for .6652 Pis -5d arising out of stranding of dredge. 1-|. 11. Smith v. R. Whiley and. M. Wliiley, claim for £1025 13s 8d on two promissory notes unpaid. IN DIVORCE. Ellen Broadbent v. Harry Broadbent, petition for dissolution of marriage. APPEAL. Gordon Harcourt v. George Linklatei appeal from decision of Warden at Hokitika. MOTION. Motion for order for maintenance of child, in estate of -Janet McMillan, of Hokitika, deceased. IN BANKRUPTCY. Charles Henry Duncan, application for discharge. William Henry Batson, application for discharge. W H. ROBINSON OF CHRISTchurcH, UMBER .MERCHANT V Will LEY AND WHILEY, KOKAT A 111 ROAD. SAWMILLERS. DISCONTINUANTE FILED. This was an action commenced hr the the plaintiff. Mr W. H. Robinson, .|,,;iinsl the defomlents. Robert Whiley a o,l Margaret Whiley for the recovery of £4,500 for alleged breach of a contract to supply milled timber. The plaintiff claimed that lie had bought under a contract for 12 months at 1/3 per 100 superficial foot, and sold to (! un nel sons Limited for 21/6 pei 100 superficial feet which would have returned him a profit of I 3 per 100 superficial feet of timber. Tlie action was commenced in Christ-,-hurch and on ih c application of tlie. defendants for change of venue, was removed to Hokitika for trial at the coming Supreme Court sittings. Tlie plaintiff then made application to the Court to hav,- the legal argument heard in Christchurch. The plaintiff contended that such argument would dispose of the ease. The defendants successfully - resisted this way of summarily disposing of their right to have the case tried at Hokitika by a jury, and the case was set down for hearing at Hokitika.

The plaintiff has now discontinued the action which h t . did by filing and serving a notice of discontinuance. Alc-sis Slater, Sargent and Dale of Christchurch wore solicitors for tlie plaintiff. Messrs Park and Murdoch of Hokitika were solicitors for the defendants.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19210314.2.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 14 March 1921, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
372

SUPREME COURT. HOKITIKA Hokitika Guardian, 14 March 1921, Page 1

SUPREME COURT. HOKITIKA Hokitika Guardian, 14 March 1921, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert