Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WOWS EXPECTATIONS

JURY AWARDS £250. MELBOURNE 1 , October 23. Evidence on behalf ot the defendant iy was heard, before Judge Doth ridge an<3 >y a jury in the County Court yesterday, >f in a case in which a young woman i- claimed £SOO on the ground that a il verbal promise of a bequest of that r, amount had not been honoured. The it plaintiff was Elsie May Bonetto, of y S pencer street, Clifton. Hill, and the dc t- fendant the Trustees, Executors, and Agencv Company, trustee of the will r of the late Mrs K. S. Hann, of Ocean e G„ ov e Plaintiff alleged that Mis !- Hann with whom she went to live in d 1902, as quite a young girl, promised to 11 bequeath her £SOO on condition hat is 2 worked in her house and lived e with her without wages. Plaintiff .-aid - S 5 because she returned to , few minutes after 10 o clock ine » ni"ht in 1914, she was refused adrnr- -- cion and next day was told to leave. V When Mrs Hann died recently plamuff 6 received nothing under the will. _ The defence was a denial of the con 8 tract or agreement to bequeath- money , in lieu of wages. The contract, if t a ny, was vague and indefinite. It was I alleged that, if there were any conti act II it had been terminated by the conduc e of the plaintiff. , , , . Evidence was given for the defem an f / company by James Hann, of Ocean , 1 Grove, who was the husband of the .es- • j tatrix. He said that he and Mrs Hann I being childless, they advertised m IJO2 I I with a view to adopting a girl under I ]o year of age. Plaintiff’s mother took i' her to Mrs Hann ,and the child was 3 taken into the house and treated pract tieally as a daughter. She was known > as Elsie Hann. Witness said that his i , wife had never promised to leave plaini tiff £SOO, but that ho himself had l done so. He had accordingly inserted i provision in his will, where it rgmainr ed until a certain incident occurred ; after plaintiff’s marriage, when her » husband had gone away on active scr- : j vice. There was certainly no contract ' for a bequest of £SOO either on lis l wife’s part or his own. Judge Dethridge said, in the course - of bis summing up, that nowadays every girl who was worth her salt did household duties in-her home, unless sl.o ' went out to business, or was a mere ■ encumberance on the face of the earth. I Plaintiff was practically a daughter, and daughters did not get wages. The jury found for the plaintiff, and . assessed damages at £250. Judgment was entered accordingly, with costs. A stay of proceedings of 14 days was granted.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19201116.2.41

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Hokitika Guardian, 16 November 1920, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
477

WOWS EXPECTATIONS Hokitika Guardian, 16 November 1920, Page 3

WOWS EXPECTATIONS Hokitika Guardian, 16 November 1920, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert